data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be7e6/be7e61313322cd993dd067d3db14f2e3c2339b90" alt=""
Tuesday, 8 December 2009
Moore V Marr
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be7e6/be7e61313322cd993dd067d3db14f2e3c2339b90" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Looks like you have ended up here at the old Editor's blog through an outdated source.
You can click on the following link to redirect to the new blog (and magazine website) at www.historytoday.com/editor
Also, for anyone with an RSS subscription or who has been kind enough to add us to your blogroll, please take a moment to update those links now.
Thanks! See you at www.historytoday.com/editor
2 comments:
I enjoyed the series, but I agree with you completely when you say "an opportunity missed"
It's a shame even today history on television still sticks steadfast to old rules and tired cliches.
But where's the alternative?
More importantly, when will Charles Moore be brought to justice for refusing to pay his TV licence fee. (He's giving the money to Help the Aged instead, as a protest against Jonathan Ross's continued employment at the BBC.) Judging by the spectacular amount of anti-BBC whingeing he does, he must consume far more hours of the Corporation's output than the average punter. Pay up Charles, or throw your telly out of the window and find a new scapegoat to blame for the state of modern Britain.
Post a Comment